Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00715
Original file (PD 2014 00715.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX      CASE: PD -20 14 - 00715
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 201 4 0911
Separation Date: 20040512


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSgt/E-5 (4T051/Medical Lab Journeyman) medically separated for a back condition. This condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Air Force Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a temporary P4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Low back pain (LBP) with radiculopathy, characterized as not meeting retention standards, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. The MEB also identified and forwarded six other conditions. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated low back pain with radiculopathy as Category I (unfitting), rated at 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and DoDI 1332.38. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “Review by PDBR


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified, but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting low back condition is addressed below. The Category II (pancreatitis; adrenal hyperplasia; plantar fasciitis; ovary and headaches) and Category III (obesity) conditions were determined as not-unfitting and not contended, thus are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Those, and any other condition or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040219
VA* - (2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Low Back Pain with Radiculopathy 5237 10% Mild Central Bulge L3-4 5243 10% 20040315
Other x 6 (Not in Scope)
Other x 7 (Not in Scope) 20040315
Combined: 10%
Combined: 40%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20040518 (most proxi mate to date of separation )


invalid font number 31502



ANALYSIS SUMMARY :

LBP with Radiculopathy Condition . The CI developed LBP in June 2003 without a specific injury identified . She was seen in family p ractice for LBP that radiated to hip and down her legs. The physical exam findings were an antalgic gait, tender to palpation ( TTP ) , abnormal straight leg raise and abnormal range-of-motion ( ROM ) ; however, reflexes, motor and sensory exams were normal. The examiner or dered q uarters for 24 hours , for rest. The p hysical t herapist (PT) documented chronic LBP with tingling that radiated into the right lower extremity into the toes. The CI reported functi onal limitation of bending over , and quick or prolonged movements. The physical exam findings were full ROM standing, decreased LBP with extension, tenderness in the medial aspect of the left piriformis muscle , 4+/5 strength in both lower extremities and normal reflexe s. The examiner diagnosed left- sided sacroiliac joint dysfunction. A lumbosacral spine X -ray was normal. A lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) showed a mild central disc bulge at L3-4 with mild central canal narrowing and minimal arthritic changes at L4- The examiner noted that the CI had some relief for the LBP with oral steroids and was given a steroid injection o n 9 October 2003. The family practitioner noted LBP , which radiated to both legs. She requested additional PT treatment due to her worsening symptoms. The physical findings were TTP of the lumbosacral spine and ROM with normal reflexes , sens ation and strength . The CI continued with PT and family practice without any improvement in the LBP symptom s. A repeat lumbosacral spine X -ray was normal . The CI was given a P4 p rofile for chronic pancreatitis, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, migraines and LBP radiculopathy . The commander’s statement noted that although the CI maintained an excellent attitude and worked full duty shifts when she was physically and medically able, she missed 3 weeks of work due to illness and her conditions prec luded her from full-time duty.

The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam ( approximately 3 months prior to separation ) documented that the CI had constant, b urning, sharp middle - to - lower back pain rated at 7/10 . Pain was worse with physical activity , relieved by rest and pain medications . She had undergone injections for the LBP which allow ed some improvement with pain and increase d her ability to performed activities . There were no ROM’s done at this exam. Three months prior to separation, a family practi ce provider noted LBP that radiated into the lower extremities, a burning sensation with left knee and outer thigh numbness. The physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below .

The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam (approximately 2 months prior to separation ) documented constant, burning, sharp, chronic middle and LBP which radiated down both legs , made worse by ac tivity and relieved by rest, narcotics and medication for neuralgia. She rated the pain 7/10 and at times required complete bed rest of 3-5 days . The functional limitations were an inability to lift any significant weight. She had constant pain that radiated down her legs with the back pain , reported left - sided knee numbness with shooting, tingling and burning pain down both sides. Due to the LBP with radiculopathy, she was unable to take out the trash, push a lawnmower, garden or do any significant shopping; however she was able to work as a laboratory technician. The VA C&P physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below .

The ROM evaluation s in evidence, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation s, are summarized in the following chart:

Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees) Fam. Practice 3 Mo s . Pre-Sep VA C&P 2 Mo s . Pre-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) Decrease ROM 90
Combined (240) - - 240
Comment Normal gait; Pos. tenderness to palpation; No spasm; Normal strength, sensation & reflexes Normal gait; No painful motion or spasm ; Pos. tenderness ; Neg. straight leg raise; Normal strength, sensation & reflexes
§4.71a Rating 10 % 1 0%
invalid font number 31502 The Board directs attenti invalid font number 31502 on to its rating recommendation invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 based on the above evidence invalid font number 31502 . invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 The PEB coded the LBP invalid font number 31502 with invalid font number 31502 r invalid font number 31502 adiculopathy condition as 5237 invalid font number 31502 ( invalid font number 31502 l invalid font number 31502 umbosacral or cervical strain invalid font number 31502 ) invalid font number 31502 , invalid font number 31502 rated at 10%. invalid font number 31502 The PEB document contained the following passage, “ invalid font number 31502 w invalid font number 31502 hile none of member's conditions is singularly unfitting, the IPEB opines member's total invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 condition renders her unfit and rates the most persistent/highest rated condition. invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 The VA coded the invalid font number 31502 mild central bulge invalid font number 31502 L3- invalid font number 31502 4 invalid font number 31502 with invalid font number 31502 mild canal narrowing and minimal facet change invalid font number 31502 L4-5 with s invalid font number 31502 ciatica condition as 5243 invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 ( invalid font number 31502 i invalid font number 31502 ntervertebral invalid font number 31502 d invalid font number 31502 isc invalid font number 31502 s invalid font number 31502 yndrome invalid font number 31502 ), invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 rated at 10%. invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 The General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine considers the CI’s invalid font number 31502 pain symptoms “w invalid font number 31502 ith or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease. ” invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Both invalid font number 31502 exams proximate to invalid font number 31502 separation invalid font number 31502 were consistent with a 10% rating IAW the General Rating Formula. invalid font number 31502 The VA coded invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 and invalid font number 31502 applied its 10% rating invalid font number 31502 based on invalid font number 31502 incapacitating episodes invalid font number 31502 ; invalid font number 31502 however invalid font number 31502 , invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 there was no documentation of invalid font number 31502 bed rest invalid font number 31502 prescribed by a invalid font number 31502 physician invalid font number 31502 as required to apply the incapacitating episode rating criteria. invalid font number 31502 Board precedent is that a functional impairment tied to fitness is required to support a recommendation for addition of a peripheral nerve rating at separation. invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 The pain component of a radiculopathy is subsumed under the general spine rating as specified in §4.71a. invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 The sensory component in this case has no functional implications invalid font number 31502 and there was no motor impairment that could be invalid font number 31502 linked to significant physical impairment invalid font number 31502 . invalid font number 31502 There is thus no evidence of a separately ratable functional impairment (with fitness implications) from the residual radiculopathy and the Board cannot support a recommendation for an additional disability rating on this basis. invalid font number 31502 After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the invalid font number 31502 LBP invalid font number 31502 with r invalid font number 31502 adiculopathy condition invalid font number 31502 . invalid font number 31502


BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on DoDI 1332.38 for rating LBP with radiculopathy was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that instruction by the Board. In the matter of the LBP with radiculopathy condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI's disability and separation determination.
















The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 140206 , w/atchs
Exhib
it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans
’ Affairs Treatment Record





                          

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAF/MRB

Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:

         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2014-00715

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.

                                                               Sincerely,




                                                              
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency

Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01931

    Original file (PD-2013-01931.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, there was left hip pain with flexion/abduction and no pain radiation into the groin. straight leg raise; Normal strength; No Deluca criteria§4.71a Rating-20%10% invalid font number 31502 The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB coded the chronic LBP condition as 5237, lumbosacral or cervical strain, and rated at 10%. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01924

    Original file (PD 2014 01924.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20080711VA - based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Lumbar DDD523710%Lumbar DDD with Radiculopathy524220%STROther X 0 (Not in Scope)Other x1 Combined: 10%Combined: 30%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20090124 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. A...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01492

    Original file (PD-2013-01492.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the 10% rating criteria – “localized tenderness not resulting in abnormal gait or abnormal spinal contour.” All exams proximate to separation documented paraspinal tenderness at the mid to lower lumbar regions and the only exam with ROM measurements documented normal thoracolumbar ROM.The “General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02384

    Original file (PD-2013-02384.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chronic Back Pain Due To Lumbar DDD/Extruded Discs Condition . Pre-SepVA C&P 16 Days Pre-SepFlexion (90 Normal)65Used ROM’s from PT exam60Combined (240)210210CommentPos. invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00218

    Original file (PD 2013 00218.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was referred to physical therapy (PT) for S1 radiculopathy with physical exam findings of antalgic gait, L5-S1 pain, and positive straight leg raise on the right. By precedent, the Board threshold for a “moderate” peripheral nerve rating requires some functionally significant motor and/or sensory impairment.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01840

    Original file (PD-2013-01840.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the low back pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02524

    Original file (PD-2013-02524.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 6.5 months after separation documented that the CI had constant daily neck pain rated at 7/10, neck stiffness occurred with turning the neck to any side with radiation down both upper extremities with feelings of hand weakness during an acute exacerbation. invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01082

    Original file (PD 2012 01082.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s role is confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, based on severity at the time of separation. In the matter of the chronic LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5243, IAW VASRD §4.71a that was in effect at the time of separation. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00814

    Original file (PD 2014 00814.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Anterior Lumbar Fusion524120%Low Back Strain with Sciatica5243-523720%20100128Left Leg Numbness Associated with Low Back Strain with Sciatica852010%20100128L5-S1 Herniated DiskCategory IISee Above20100128MicrodiskectomyCategory IISee Above20100128Other x1 (Not in Scope)Other x520100111 Combined: 20%Combined: 70%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20100420 (most proximate to date of separation) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01210

    Original file (PD 2014 01210.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    invalid font number 31502 Service FPEB – Dated 20050119VA - (1Mo. Physical Disability Board of Review Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.